The Next Campus
Before choosing to own, lease or partner, compare the financial exposure, speed and control each model brings.
A PRIVATE FORUM FOR SCHOOL, COLLEGE & UNIVERSITY LEADERS
You already know architects, consultants and contractors. EduInfra Expand brings fresh perspectives, specialist expertise and informed conversations to the choices that matter next.
Three things an experienced education owner should leave with.
Put capital, real estate, design, delivery and opening-day choices under the right scrutiny—before the consequences become expensive.
Explore the programme 02Discover specialist firms whose actual education-sector experience may be relevant to the brief on your desk—not simply the names everyone already knows.
See how we curate 03Compare experiences with other education leaders and meet relevant professionals with enough context to have a useful business discussion.
See the meeting formatGood campus projects begin long before a contractor arrives. They begin with questions about what to build, what to finance, whom to appoint and what the institution will need ten years later.
The first reason to come to Bengaluru is the programme itself.
EduInfra Expand is a closed-door, one-day education-infrastructure forum organised by AlphaGamma Market Ventures. The EduInfra Series combines practical campus discussions, project intelligence and curated introductions; Expand follows EduInfra Connect in Mumbai.
The programme is built around real decisions faced by school groups and universities. Each session has a question to settle, a practical lens to examine it through and something useful to take back to your team.
By invitation only
Before choosing to own, lease or partner, compare the financial exposure, speed and control each model brings.
Challenge the expensive assumptions in your brief. Decide what must be built now, what can wait and what may never be needed.
Look beyond a firm's presentation. Learn which project references, people and delivery evidence should earn a place on your shortlist.
Choose the decisions closest to your current project.
What to own, lease, fund or partner on.
Stress-test enrolment assumptions, site feasibility, governance and funding before committing capital.
What you take awayA risk and decision checklist for the next investment stage.
Compare building, leasing and development partnerships through capital needs, speed, design control and expansion.
What you take awayA practical decision matrix for campus ownership and occupancy.
Examine how campus ownership and capital deployment support institutional growth and operating flexibility.
What you take awayA sharper framework for capital allocation.
Connect pedagogy, enrolment, age groups and inclusion to capacity, room types, layout and phasing.
What you take awayA stronger campus brief before design, budget and scope are locked.
The early gates and trade-offs that shape delivery.
Map institution, architect and PMC responsibilities across feasibility, design, cost planning, approvals and procurement.
What you take awayA sequence that reduces avoidable early-stage rework.
Examine live-campus phasing, safe access, temporary spaces, utilities and construction constraints.
What you take awayA checklist for protecting continuity during expansion.
Test space needs against actual use; explore sharing, adapting or deferring facilities.
What you take awayA build-now, phase-later, not-yet filter.
Examine integrated delivery, design responsibility, independent quality checks and accountability for defects.
What you take awayA test for choosing the appropriate delivery structure.
Examine Yelahanka, Devanahalli, Doddaballapura and KWIN City through land, access, infrastructure and approval readiness.
What you take awayA more realistic view of the corridor and what remains unconfirmed.
From design ambition to lived learning experience.
Trace built-campus decisions through cost reviews, specifications, engineering and construction.
What you take awayHow to protect design intent without ignoring delivery.
Explore layout, daylight, acoustics, comfort, access and technology through a built learning environment.
What you take awayA more useful way to assess learning spaces against teaching needs and observed use.
The appointment, cost and schedule decisions.
Work backwards from academic opening to approvals, design freezes and long-lead procurement.
What you take awayA reverse-programme approach to delivery.
Assess education experience, portfolio relevance, proposed teams, scope, fees and references.
What you take awayEvidence to ask for before procurement or appointment.
Connect orientation, materials, envelope and service access to energy, maintenance, replacement and downtime.
What you take awayA whole-life-cost lens for procurement.
Translate international teaching requirements into Indian climate, codes, local supply and maintenance conditions.
What you take awayA distinction between essential standards and local adaptation.
Structured campus project updates examine stage, appointments, milestones and requirements.
What you take awayA more reliable way to distinguish progress from intent.
Learning, facilities and a working Day 1.
Examine age-group separation, supervision, play, circulation, accessibility and evacuation in a built vertical school.
What you take awayThe design and operating trade-offs of high density.
Connect furniture to learning layouts, ergonomics, flexibility, durability, procurement and opening readiness.
What you take awayAn early furniture specification checklist.
Connect commissioning, statutory readiness, furniture, IT, labs, training, snagging and handover.
What you take awayA Day 1 operating-readiness framework.
All times IST. Registration and coffee: 08:30. Welcome: 09:00. Lunch: 13:00–13:45. Coffee: 11:27–11:42 and 15:28–15:38. Curated 30-minute meetings run in parallel from 13:45 to 17:45; indicate which conference sessions you want to protect during onboarding. Closing remarks: 17:20–17:25. Networking: 17:45 onwards. Session formats and timings may be refined.
Perspectives from architecture, campus design, specialist learning environments and education furniture.
Partner
Vijay Gupta Architects (VGA)
Senior Principal Architect
AHC
Partner
SJK Architects
Principal Architect
STHAPATI
Regional Head, Bengaluru
Edifice Consultants
Design Head – Bengaluru
IMK Architects
Principal
Studio Lotus
Director Sales & Marketing
Bonton Furniture
Chief Experience Strategist
Rubenius
Managing Director
Education Design International
We find out what you're considering and which questions are still open. Relevant participants see enough context to assess the fit before either side agrees to meet.
A new campus, an upgrade, land search or specialist facility—even if you're still exploring options.
Potential matches are connected to the project stage, scope and the experience they can bring.
Thirty-minute, face-to-face meetings are scheduled where both sides want to meet.
Leave with the right contacts, clearer questions and agreed follow-up actions.
Your delegate pass provides the opportunity to request relevant meetings; a fixed number is not guaranteed. Review the fit and protect the conference sessions you want to attend.
Share my institutional requirement ↗Once the right decisions are on the table, the question becomes who has the experience to help you act on them.
Most institutions don't struggle to find companies. The familiar firms may already be doing excellent work. But a new campus, a different teaching model or an ambitious opening date can call for expertise the institution hasn't needed before.
That's when a wider, properly researched shortlist becomes useful.
A school group is planning several sites while setting common standards for learning spaces and managing different local delivery conditions.
Early planning · Architecture and delivery strategy under consideration
Our shortlist starts with the requirement, not a brand name.
Design philosophy, project stage, budgets, location, appointment status and the academic opening date.
What the firm actually delivered for education clients, its team and its relevant specialist strengths.
Scope, scale, geography, availability and the reasons a particular firm may be worth examining.
Familiarity is not our test. Relevance to an institution's real requirements is. These are the questions we examine before we bring a specialist into the conversation.
Has the team delivered comparable schools, universities or specialist learning environments?
Can we point to completed work, measurable scope, references and the people behind the delivery?
Does the firm suit this project's stage, budget, technical needs and procurement route?
Can the team realistically serve the location, scale and required timelines?
What can this firm do especially well that the institution may not find within its usual network?
Will both teams benefit from a discussion about an actual requirement?
These five published portfolios show the range of experience we look for—from education-led architecture and multi-site delivery to technology-rich learning spaces and institutional furniture.
Its work on KAI Early Years places exploration, movement and sensory experiences at the centre of the learning environment. That matters when a promoter wants a campus designed around how children learn, rather than a standard building brief.
Relevant for Curriculum fit · campus planning · early learning environments
Child-led spatial planning, sensory gardens and seamless indoor–outdoor movement make this relevant when learning philosophy must shape a campus.
Its school-sector portfolio, including VIBGYOR-related work, offers a relevant starting point when an institution is examining repeatable campus standards and site-specific adaptation.
Relevant for K–12 campuses · repeatable design · multi-location planning
HMD cites more than 30 commissioned VIBGYOR schools, with repeatable design modules for faster multi-site rollout. Its R N Podar School is among its published institutional projects.
Its published multi-location education-centre programme provides an example of coordinating mobilisation and execution across multiple locations. Useful experience to examine when the difficulty is delivery across sites, not only design.
Relevant for Multi-site execution · project coordination · design and build
The firm's published account covers 11 education centres, 72,000 sq ft and a delivery window of about 30 days, coordinated across multiple locations.
The Scaler Innovation Lab brings together robotics, drones, XR and machine-learning environments within a 10,000 sq ft specialist facility. It shows why an innovation-lab brief asks different questions from a conventional interior fit-out.
Relevant for Innovation laboratories · interdisciplinary design · technical integration
A 10,000 sq ft environment encompassing robotics, drones, XR and AI/ML labs—a useful reference for technology-intensive educational spaces.
Its education-related references span classrooms, libraries and laboratories. For an institution, that experience matters because student use, ergonomics, durability and installation requirements differ across each space.
Relevant for Classrooms · laboratories · libraries · institutional furniture
The company publishes education furniture for classrooms, libraries and laboratories. These references help an institution examine ergonomics, durability and suitability for each learning space.
A learning-led primary school, a multi-campus network and a technology-intensive laboratory should not automatically lead to the same shortlist. Our role is to understand the distinction.
Across architecture, engineering, delivery and learning environments, the useful distinction is the experience relevant to your brief. Bengaluru has 75 planned adviser and specialist places within its curated room.
The specialist network is under curation for 3 December. Participation is by selection and confirmation.
On 17 March 2026, education operators, senior advisers and infrastructure partners came together for the first EduInfra Connect at Jio Convention Centre, Mumbai.
See the setting, conversations and people from our first edition.
CEO, K–12 Schools
Lighthouse Learning
President
Narayana Group
Senior Vice President
ANAROCK Capital
Associate Executive Director
CBRE India
Managing Director
Novistra Capital
Managing Director
The Collective Infra
Selected speakers from the previous edition; roles shown for that programme.
“The event uniquely brought education organizations and real estate developers together...”
“The event was well-organized, providing a platform to connect with industry peers, investors, and partners...”
“The format is intense, and the room is exactly right...”
“The [forum] was well-curated, offering great networking, valuable insights from higher education and K-12 sectors...”
Participant feedback from EduInfra Connect Mumbai.
Education owners need to meet one another as much as they need to meet the supply side. The room is being shaped around a balance of institutional decision-makers, professional advisers and specialist partners.
Planned audience allocation. Places are subject to curation and individual confirmation.
A selection from the EduInfra programme and engagement network.
Architecture, design, planning and project advisory practices.
Delivery partners and specialist campus solutions.
Logos show organisations in the programme and engagement universe. Event participation and individual meetings are confirmed separately through curation.
150 planned places. A deliberately balanced room, rather than an open-entry exhibition.
North Bengaluru connects established education institutions with emerging development proposals. For owners assessing land, a new campus or their next growth market, the critical question is what is operational, what is advancing and what remains only an announcement.
See “North Bengaluru: What Is Actually Moving?” on the agenda ↗Established education activity and transport connectivity.
Development activity and infrastructure questions relevant to campus planning.
Growth proposals requiring stage-by-stage evaluation.
A prospective knowledge-focused development whose institutional opportunities require verification.
For a school group or university weighing land or its next campus, North Bengaluru deserves a closer look. The discussion brings development plans into focus alongside the questions every institution must answer: where, when and with whom to move forward.
Knowledge, wellbeing and innovation are central to the proposed development. Watch KWIN City's introduction to the project and consider the possibilities it opens for learning and research institutions.
Open the video on Instagram ↗Conference discussions, curated meetings and informal conversations at Four Seasons Hotel Bengaluru.
8 Bellary Road, Ganganagar
Bengaluru, Karnataka 560032
Your institution, your project and the expertise you want to explore. Three short steps, followed by review from the EduInfra team.
Leadership workshop consideration selected. Complete your institutional application below for review.
The team will review your institution and requirement, then contact you using your selected method. If approved, we will share payment instructions for the ₹20,000 + 18% GST delegate pass (₹23,600 total). Attendance is confirmed after approval and payment.
You can also write to ganesh@eduinfraseries.com to discuss your institution's circumstances.
The institutional delegate pass is ₹20,000 + 18% GST, or ₹23,600 per person including GST. Apply with your institution and project requirements; payment is requested after approval.
Keep the partners who work well for you. EduInfra gives you additional perspectives, relevant specialist capabilities and owner-to-owner discussions that may help with the next stage or a different kind of requirement.
No. Land search, feasibility, early planning, network expansion, specialist facility development and operating-campus upgrades are all relevant starting points.
Share your project stage, location, timing, indicative investment and the requirement still open. We will discuss what can remain confidential and what may be shared with potential meeting participants, with your agreement.
Your delegate pass provides access to the conference and the opportunity to request mutually accepted meetings. A fixed number is not included or guaranteed.
Some afternoon sessions overlap with the meeting window. During onboarding you can indicate which sessions you want to prioritise and whether additional team representation is useful.
We review your institution, role and project context, then contact you using your chosen method. If approved, we share the official invitation and payment instructions. Attendance is confirmed after approval and payment.